Karishma Upadhyay of called the film 'a winner from the first frame to the last' and praised Rajamouli's screenplay, writing that it made 'the absurd seem real, willing you to accept anything that he throws at you'. Also for The Hindu, Malathi Rangarajan wrote, 'Let's celebrate the figment of Rajamouli's imagination that has made the housefly appear as invincible as any of our muscle-flexing heroes'. Critical response Baradwaj Rangan, writing for The Hindu, said without a human protagonist, only a villain and a heroine, the audience is 'led through a story that's funny, sentimental, action-packed, romantic-there's even a bit of the occult thrown in'. Regarding the performance of Makkhi, Rajamouli felt the film was poorly presented and did not reach its theatrical audience even though it was better received on television, and so later on collaborated with filmmaker – whom he considered the 'one missing link' – on the presentation of the Hindi-dubbed version of his later film, Baahubali: The Beginning. Malathi Rangarajan said the antagonist took the 'extreme step' of murdering the hero early in the film, in contrast with the stereotypical antagonist whose lust for the female lead has just begun and threatens the hero.Commenting on the usage of, The New Indian Express ' Kruthi Grover found the death of the similar to the story of, a demon in Indian mythology to whom gives the power to reduce a person to ashes by touching her or his head. Criticised the relationship between the lead pair, which he said advocates stalking as an accepted form of romance. Malini Mannath of found the scene where the fly foils Sudeep's attempt to get close to Bindu reminiscent of one in the film (1990). Rangan has likened Eega to a ghost film because a dead protagonist returns to his loved ones as a troubled soul. Compared Eega to Cockroach (2010), an Australian short film about a man who is reincarnated as a cockroach after he is accidentally killed on his wedding day.The film's secondary theme is the survival of love beyond death. According to Tamil film historian and actor, Naan Ee-unlike the animal-centred films (1972) and (1979)-lacks a human protagonist.įilm critic found Eega 's protagonist realistic, contrary to the ones in the animated films by, except when it displays a few traits. Crazy Mohan compared the film with (1989), a revenge drama whose protagonist Appu is a.Mohan told Malathi Rangarajan of that although the film's script may resemble those of (1999) and (2001), the use of the plight of someone tormented by a housefly was an original idea.
At a meeting with students at the Annapurna International School of Film and Media Campus (AIFSM), he compared the battle between the fly and Sudeep, which the underdog fly wins, to 's triumph over and India's victory in the.
Rajamouli identified some similarities to 's (1986), in which a scientist becomes a fly when his experiment malfunctions, and thought of Eega as a ' rather than a. Rajamouli compared the battle between the fly and Sudeep with that between and ( pictured), saying that victories by underdogs matter.The film's main theme is revenge the soul of a murdered man is reincarnated as a fly and seeks revenge against his killer.
0 kommentar(er)
